Well I know I am now totally F***ed. I truly have no idea what to do now. If I hesitate I know for a fact that plako will get a settler over to either the Iron (most likely) or down to the fish. And that’ll essentially lock me out from getting a city in that area. But if I get my settler over there ASAP (which I’m still not even 100% I can do in 2 turns because of those stupid attacks) my only defense for a little while will be the Axe & Spear. And the Axe will most likely need to get put onto the Iron while the workers work it. Tthat is, if plako doesn’t manage to double move me this time (which he seems pretty good at usually) and take them with his archer (which he can probably promote massively, capture the workers, and even with losing the 25% fortification bonus I STILL won’t be able to kill).
I’ve whipped out a Chariot from Dragon’s Mouth so that will rush over, a Sword up in Hard Knocks will be complete in 3 turns, and if I get a chance to log in before the turn flips I suppose I now need to change the production in PoD from the library (which a forest chop was going to go into) to an Archer or something that will make it get built in 1 or 2 turns.
But in either case, even if I get this city settled, I have a feeling it’s going to be tough to keep. Plako will most likely go full force trying to get that Iron.
Which is the worst case scenario? I build the city, which plako then causes grief around (and maybe tries to attack)? Or plako gets a city built in that area and my settler has to go elsewhere, such as north to my barren wastelands? I know if he doesn’t try to go after those workers, that his archer will probably sit on that hill forever. So with that being the only hill in the immediate vicinity of where the city would be, it loses access to a potential mine (only being able to use the Iron mine when built). But I’m currently still leaning towards trying to get a city over there, since I think I may be more screwed if he gets one there first.
I suppose an alternate option is to not go that far east. Is there another tile (that gets the iron in the city’s first ring) that might be more suitable? I wasn’t able to get a picture taken last night since I was so frustrated at my stupidity, but right now if you look at the prior picture my 2 workers are 1 tile east of where they were (they will insta-road that tile next turn) , and the Axe/Spear are standing on the Iron. I hit the button too fast, and realized after the fact I should have left the spear un-moved in case plako moved the archer towards the workers, as then I could move the spear onto them to protect them.
Should I maybe consider just dumping the settler into the jungle north of the Iron and moving the Spear back there? I didn’t want the city there originally because it overlaps too many other things, plus it fully opens up the area SE for plako to get the Fish site (a city right on that southern forest….it gets two fish). But is that my only option at this point? Thoughts on a city there vs a city on the east side of the Iron?
My settler is currently in Mt Whacko. So with the workers insta-roading, next turn the settler could move right onto the jungle north of the Iron. And the turn after I could have the city planted.
Otherwise, settler moves onto the Iron with the Axe/Spear and the following turn the city could get settled on the river tile 1E of the Iron where I was originally planning.
I know the first tile is safer, quicker, and if I can get a monument & library built fast enough, it’s culture will try to fight for the Gems. Actually, before I even start thinking about this….will the game even let me settle on that spot? It’s only 2 tiles from Rotterdam, and I think I recall that a city has to be 3 tiles away. If that’s the case….then I truly have no idea of what other alternatives I have other than settling the city 1E of Iron.
Please, begging for a little guidance here. I need to find a way to fix my stupidity. I know that's a tough task, but I need to at least try. Even if I leave myself open to being steamrolled by plako.