Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis

Create an account  

 
A new mod enters the ring - Introducing "Close to Home"

Just checked. Yes that AGG still has the worker bonus is a mistake and I will fix that. Fin on the other hand should still contain the bank bonus, so here I accidentally deleted that in the changelog.
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

I posted a new Version 1.3 which contains the fixes to AGG and FIN/Change log. I also added Art for the new units and buildings
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

Is it deliberate that the Ikhanda doesn't get the same happiness bonus from AGG leaders as the barracks does?
Reply

No that's a mistake. I guess you ran into that problem in PB52, right? Thanks, for pointing that out.
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

I will prepare a new mod version and send it to Ramk for an update.
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

(July 7th, 2020, 12:32)Charriu Wrote: No that's a mistake. I guess you ran into that problem in PB52, right? Thanks, for pointing that out.

Funnily enough, I only noticed that AGG had that bonus when looking at it for PB53, otherwise I would have brought it up sooner.

(July 7th, 2020, 12:38)Charriu Wrote: I will prepare a new mod version and send it to Ramk for an update.

Does this mean it can be updated in-game for PB52?
Reply

That is possible, but let's do that discussion back in PB52.
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

When linking to Dropbox (for your mod download), if you change the last character of the Dropbox download link from =0 to =1 the download will start immediately instead of linking to Dropbox. Saves a couple clicks and a few seconds for users wink
Reply

Ah thanks, I will do that in the future.
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

Suggestion for a change:
Civ4 diplomatic offers containing an issue in PBEM/PB games:
Assume player A sends a trade offer with n entries to player B.
If some of the entries are unavailable if B getting the trade screen, not the whole offer
will be canceled but the sub entries.

Examples:
• player A offers 'Gold vs Silver' to B and C.
B accepted the deal and C getting a blackmail (nothing for Silver). Bad for A's reputation wink

• A offers 'copper vs copper' to B and B offers the same deal to C.
• B could now 'steal' A's offer if C had already accept the deal. This is fun if A can not declare war and it is they only copper. wink


How could this be changed:
a) We put a warning into the diplomatic window that the conditions had changed.
b) We put the missing items into the diplomatic window.
c) We silently suppress the deal.
d) ?!
Reply



Forum Jump: