Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Just checked. Yes that AGG still has the worker bonus is a mistake and I will fix that. Fin on the other hand should still contain the bank bonus, so here I accidentally deleted that in the changelog.
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
I posted a new Version 1.3 which contains the fixes to AGG and FIN/Change log. I also added Art for the new units and buildings
Posts: 2,705
Threads: 32
Joined: Jan 2014
Is it deliberate that the Ikhanda doesn't get the same happiness bonus from AGG leaders as the barracks does?
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
No that's a mistake. I guess you ran into that problem in PB52, right? Thanks, for pointing that out.
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
I will prepare a new mod version and send it to Ramk for an update.
July 7th, 2020, 13:41
(This post was last modified: July 7th, 2020, 13:41 by Mr. Cairo.)
Posts: 2,705
Threads: 32
Joined: Jan 2014
(July 7th, 2020, 12:32)Charriu Wrote: No that's a mistake. I guess you ran into that problem in PB52, right? Thanks, for pointing that out.
Funnily enough, I only noticed that AGG had that bonus when looking at it for PB53, otherwise I would have brought it up sooner.
(July 7th, 2020, 12:38)Charriu Wrote: I will prepare a new mod version and send it to Ramk for an update.
Does this mean it can be updated in-game for PB52?
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
That is possible, but let's do that discussion back in PB52.
Posts: 6,143
Threads: 55
Joined: Apr 2012
When linking to Dropbox (for your mod download), if you change the last character of the Dropbox download link from =0 to =1 the download will start immediately instead of linking to Dropbox. Saves a couple clicks and a few seconds for users
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Ah thanks, I will do that in the future.
Posts: 979
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2014
Suggestion for a change:
Civ4 diplomatic offers containing an issue in PBEM/PB games:
Assume player A sends a trade offer with n entries to player B.
If some of the entries are unavailable if B getting the trade screen, not the whole offer
will be canceled but the sub entries.
Examples:
• player A offers 'Gold vs Silver' to B and C.
B accepted the deal and C getting a blackmail (nothing for Silver). Bad for A's reputation
• A offers 'copper vs copper' to B and B offers the same deal to C.
• B could now 'steal' A's offer if C had already accept the deal. This is fun if A can not declare war and it is they only copper.
How could this be changed:
a) We put a warning into the diplomatic window that the conditions had changed.
b) We put the missing items into the diplomatic window.
c) We silently suppress the deal.
d) ?!
|