April 10th, 2019, 15:41
(This post was last modified: April 10th, 2019, 15:43 by Mardoc.)
Posts: 12,510
Threads: 61
Joined: Oct 2010
(April 10th, 2019, 15:24)sunrise089 Wrote: Given that I forgot we HAD forms down past Civ my preference is for part of Gaming Table 
They're not dead, though; MOO MoM and Diablo get regular posts still, and most of the other games get at least a trickle. Maybe a reorg, so that the non-civ subforums are more obvious? Keep Civ General and the active games up top but move the rest of the Civ subforums below the other games (or at least below the still-active other games)?
Then Wargroove would have its own forum which seems more logical to me.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker
Posts: 8,773
Threads: 95
Joined: Oct 2017
Unless everything is moved and the forums look like Civ 4 pitboss- other games- Wargroove-completed games/ect.. id rather have wargroove as a subforum like werewolf/ect.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. ![[Image: noidea.gif]](https://www.realmsbeyond.net/forums/images/smilies/noidea.gif) In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 6,836
Threads: 133
Joined: Mar 2004
I think it would belong down with Other Games. It can be near the top of that list, I'd put it just below the active MOO and MOM forums. The subforums of Gaming Table are just archives of stuff that originally happened in it.
Posts: 8,773
Threads: 95
Joined: Oct 2017
Maybe move those archives down below? and move all the currently played games + wargroove into sub forums of Gaming table so that all the games are immediately visible to those viewing the site?
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 445
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2011
Logically Wargroove should belong in Other Games. Perhaps move all the live report threads there, but keep main Wargroove thread here so it still has some visiblity?
Posts: 8,773
Threads: 95
Joined: Oct 2017
That could probably work. Still waiting on potential players for any of those, OR other maps.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 8,773
Threads: 95
Joined: Oct 2017
(April 10th, 2019, 02:39)Old Harry Wrote: I'd rather play an FFA and I have a slight preference for no fog of war so I can see how humans play different from AIs...
(April 10th, 2019, 06:18)Hesmyrr Wrote: My only preference is FFA. I'd prefer a map that at least tries to compensate for first turn advantage, so I lean towards the first map - looks pretty interesting as well.
Would map 1 of those choices as a FFA, and no fog of war work for both of you then? Would only need one more player.
Something ive been thinking of.. Do we want to put any kind of commander picking restrictions into play? any leaders look strong enough to be banned?
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 445
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2011
(April 10th, 2019, 18:17)superdeath Wrote: (April 10th, 2019, 02:39)Old Harry Wrote: I'd rather play an FFA and I have a slight preference for no fog of war so I can see how humans play different from AIs...
(April 10th, 2019, 06:18)Hesmyrr Wrote: My only preference is FFA. I'd prefer a map that at least tries to compensate for first turn advantage, so I lean towards the first map - looks pretty interesting as well.
Would map 1 of those choices as a FFA, and no fog of war work for both of you then? Would only need one more player.
Something ive been thinking of.. Do we want to put any kind of commander picking restrictions into play? any leaders look strong enough to be banned?
Map 1 FFA with no fog is perfect for me. Clear weather too, for obvious reasons.
I think Tenri and Nunu is frequent ban on Discord due to their "double move" (place+fire) utility, but they haven't been featured on this forum much so I am impartial. First map definitely benefits these two though.
Posts: 8,773
Threads: 95
Joined: Oct 2017
Nunu? the lady that pops whatever unit you want? She's been played the first 2 games. ( i killed her in one <3 )
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Bobchillingworth
Unregistered
I'm fine with Wargroove getting a forum under "Other Games". I could drop a locked "Wargroove has moved!" thread here after everything else is ported over.
|
