October 21st, 2012, 10:58
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
(October 21st, 2012, 10:51)Ichabod Wrote: I support banning some civs/leaders. Not sure about how to do it too.
First step would probably be to suggest the ones you want to ban, rather than make everyone else guess  .
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
October 21st, 2012, 11:06
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
(October 21st, 2012, 10:58)Bigger Wrote: (October 21st, 2012, 10:51)Ichabod Wrote: I support banning some civs/leaders. Not sure about how to do it too.
First step would probably be to suggest the ones you want to ban, rather than make everyone else guess .
Well, my feeling is similar to regoarrar's. I would like to be able to try some less used leaders and still be competitive. But apart from the obvious five (Willem, Sury, Pacal, India, Inca), it's hard to find a good rule.
I thought about using the PB4 bans, but maybe that one is a bit too rough.
October 21st, 2012, 11:22
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
you could just let me assign civ/leaders to all 4 of you <G>
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
October 21st, 2012, 11:35
Posts: 7,548
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2005
One thought I had would be somehow setting a rule up similar to PBEM43 (where if you picked Fin, Exp, Inca, India, etc) you lost some turns. But instead of that (or maybe in addition to that), you could make the turn order contingent on traits / civs
So we have a regular snake order, with picks randomly assigned. Then at the end, we "rank" the civs / leaders based on points (so Inca, India, FIN, EXP, CRE maybe get points). Person with the least points (so less used civs / leaders) get to start first and/or people with the most points get turns skipped
October 21st, 2012, 11:38
Posts: 7,548
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2005
Also I created a tech thread in our vets subforum so we can further discuss this and any other issues
October 21st, 2012, 12:39
Posts: 17,739
Threads: 82
Joined: Nov 2005
(October 21st, 2012, 11:38)regoarrarr Wrote: Also I created a tech thread in our vets subforum so we can further discuss this and any other issues
Good idea, let's move the conversation there:
i sleep in late and you take over the proceedings 
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
October 21st, 2012, 12:49
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
Sorry to put this here, but I thought it was a global issue: are we playing with unrestricted leaders? I know it's pretty much the standard, but I thought I would double-check.
October 21st, 2012, 13:28
(This post was last modified: October 21st, 2012, 13:28 by Sian.)
Posts: 2,265
Threads: 54
Joined: Aug 2011
unless anything else is said, unresticted is to be excepted
Specially since when looking at restricted, its not quite as balanced for the Multiplayer Meta
October 21st, 2012, 13:42
Posts: 17,739
Threads: 82
Joined: Nov 2005
Yes, that has been the norm around here so much that I completely forget it's an option in single player now 
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
October 21st, 2012, 14:26
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
|
