WW 18 Siege of the Dragon! (Game Thread)

[Selrahc]

It may be some time. Sorry everyone.

Estimate? I've been on tenterhooks.

[Bigger]

By my count:

Lewwyn (5.1) - zakalwe Bigger MJW Selrahc Mattimeo
Bigger (4)- Rowain Serdoa Azza slowcheetah
MJw (1) - waterbat
Mattimeo (1) - Lewwyn

Just realised that this is actually 5.1 to 5, as Azza has a double-vote. I expect Selrahcs wish to unvote not to count. It was before the deadline but not in red. But that of course would be Tasunkes call in the end (as would it to simply lynch Lewwyn and mod-kill Bigger).

if it did count it would break the game and be severly unfair, just as it would have last game if rowain's after the deadline attempt to switch would have. also, selrahc's request was actually minutes after 22:00, even if tasunke hadn't posted deadline yet.

that said, you had the opposite opinion last game when you were scum trying to save you teammate. not sure what that means, but its worth pointing out.

[waterbat]

He wasn't advocating for it to count. He was saying he expected it not to count.

[Bigger]

He wasn't advocating for it to count. He was saying he expected it not to count.

yes, I got that. did read the ww17 wolf thread? He was very much for rowain's post-deadline switch counting then. thankfully, uberfish didn't listen to him. it didn't matter as I was lynched by random.org anyway, but it would have been a bad precedent to set.

[Azza]

I would expect it to not count because it wasn't in red. It was before the official deadline, but he didn't actually unvote, just said he felt like doing it.

[Tasunke]

It wasn't in red, so it won't count regardless. If it was in red, it would require a judgement decision.

[Serdoa]

Bigger, are you telling me in all honesty that you really believe you can compare my behaviour from last game with this game? Despite the fact that I had a team - that I knew who was part of it - to take care of last game while this game to the best of my knowledge you are not a villager and therefore not on my team. So yeah, obviously I ask for a different solution, the one which I think is most beneficial to my team.

Therefore please explain me what exactly you believe worth pointing out. Certainly not that I always play to the best of my abilities for my team right? Because that should be obvious and not necesary to be pointed out.

[Selrahc]

By my count:

Lewwyn (5.1) - zakalwe Bigger MJW Selrahc Mattimeo
Bigger (4)- Rowain Serdoa Azza slowcheetah
MJw (1) - waterbat
Mattimeo (1) - Lewwyn

Just realised that this is actually 5.1 to 5, as Azza has a double-vote. I expect Selrahcs wish to unvote not to count. It was before the deadline but not in red. But that of course would be Tasunkes call in the end (as would it to simply lynch Lewwyn and mod-kill Bigger).

if it did count it would break the game and be severly unfair, just as it would have last game if rowain's after the deadline attempt to switch would have. also, selrahc's request was actually minutes after 22:00, even if tasunke hadn't posted deadline yet.

that said, you had the opposite opinion last game when you were scum trying to save you teammate. not sure what that means, but its worth pointing out.

Bigger?

No, seriously. I'm fine with not being allowed to unvote. Bigger's reaction in the aftermath of the deadline(and his slightly desperate yelling of "deadline!") have made me less happy with him though. If the voting was still open, I'd be unusure between him and Waterbat.

[Bigger]

I was actually thinking it gives you a slight village lean. In any case lewwyn is certainly not on your team, although meta suggested that already.

[Tasunke]

Your Write up should be coming shortly (just got back to my laptop).

I would like it if, about 5-10 minutes from now, people cease posting until the write up and kills are announced.