Posts: 6,308
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2014
Psilly if you want the last line of your post answered I can send you a PM
Posts: 718
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2015
(July 8th, 2016, 16:33)AdrienIer Wrote: Psilly if you want the last line of your post answered I can send you a PM
Hmmm...I can already see the team pondering over the possibility that there IS no other mason, and that Jkaen is lying through his teeth about, "Too bad we decided against claiming last night." Boy, would that be a ballsy play! (Because how could he be sure that there really wasn't another mason? I guess he could run the probabilities, take his chances, and if someone else did counter-claim, then just accuse the counter-claimer of being the liar). Still, I'd be giving some serious thought to the idea of Jkaen as baldly lying scum if I were a townie today. But yeah, I'm curious about the truth of it. PM me if you want. Let's see if my over-paranoia strikes again, or if my scumdar is not entirely defective after all....
Posts: 718
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2015
Also, if you think your killer was most likely a serial killer, do you think it is more likely that scum purposefully chose not to lynch, or that they were somehow blocked? I see that nobody is coming forward claiming to be a blocker, which is what I would do right away if I had blocked someone in this situation (with an odd nightkill like you going down that didn't seem like the work of scum) along with the name of the person I blocked. A great lead, and good for town cred for the blocker too. It would be too ballsy for scum to claim to have blocked someone if that person can then claim (or even prove) that they performed an action on someone else...
So it seems that scum chose not to kill. But why?
Posts: 6,308
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2014
Lewwyn Zak Fenn and Novice haven't reacted to my death yet. Each of them could be roleblocker who roleblocked the right guy or doctor who targeted the right victim or jailer who targeted either the scum or the victim. Don't draw your conclusion too quickly
Posts: 1,338
Threads: 14
Joined: May 2014
Aww, Rowain is making friends again.
Posts: 4,847
Threads: 26
Joined: Sep 2006
I was right about AdrienIer. There's a good chance that scum remembered my meta-rant in that other game I was talking about and thought that they had to kill him because of meta. There's no reason to talk about him being innoccent until after dawn so the town not clearing him doesn't mean much. I would find Zak scummy because he like meta and would cap AdrienIer because of it.
Posts: 6,308
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2014
Reading Fenn's look into my last post I can now see why scum could panic and think I had a big reveal to share (Innocent child or cop maybe).
But if scum didn't kill me there's also the possibility that they targeted the tourist.
July 9th, 2016, 12:47
(This post was last modified: July 9th, 2016, 12:47 by AdrienIer.)
Posts: 6,308
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2014
(July 9th, 2016, 12:39)Gazglum Wrote: (July 9th, 2016, 12:17)Rowain Wrote: First how do you come to Zak or yourself as target.
Second How do you come to a vig as responsible person Nobody has stepped forward so far.
Third Why do you think it was a doctor and not a jailer who jailed either the killing scum or the target.
Frankly, these also feel like questions to try and get me to tell you what my role is. Or to get someone else to tell you theirs. All you've done today Rowain is try to find out what people's powers are, and that is after scum appear to have been role-blocked in some way.
I kind of agree with Gazglum. He may be wrong (and myself as well obviously) but unless someone has something to say (like a cop saying he found scum or a vig saying he messed up) there shouldn't be any claim and Rowain should stop arguing for them.
July 9th, 2016, 17:14
(This post was last modified: July 9th, 2016, 17:15 by AdrienIer.)
Posts: 6,308
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2014
(July 9th, 2016, 17:06)Rowain Wrote: (July 9th, 2016, 16:59)Jkaen Wrote: He was saying that he wasnt going to do anything bad during the night and if it made you feel better roleblock him, but dont vig him as he was going to reveal important stuff today
This opens the question to you why were you 2 so sure he wouldn't get nightkilled after this announcement ?
Seriously scum would think I could be innocent child or something which is not a power role, why the hell would they target me. My post was specifically made in case a vig was considering killing me, to try to avoid exactly what happened. Seriously Rowain is not helping town right now
Edit : sorry for the triple post but this is driving me crazy
Posts: 718
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2015
Understandable. Prometheus is not really defending himself, so if Rowain would just quiet down he would have nothing to worry about as far as getting lynched himself. But if Rowain keeps up they might all just switch off onto him. I'm kinda surprised they haven't already. I probably would have as town if I were still playing. I guess, compared to Prometheus's kinda "meh" performance, Rowain's comes across as more of an emotionally-unhinged, paranoid townie who is actually invested in getting to the truth, but why would his dander be so fluffed up when there is hardly any vote pressure on him. Nor does he seem to want to go to bat for Prometheus either, so why be so suspicious of the motives of those who are voting for Prometheus (Gaz & co.)? Rowain doesn't seem to be arguing against Gazglum & co. based on any positive idea of Prometheus's innocence, so what exactly has his hackles up so much?
|
