I was able to re-read GKC, which was easier then expected, because he may have a lot of posts, but those are rather short. Note that this is already a tiny negative in my book.
First of all GKC was one of the players, who was defended by a known wolf (#70) early on. I know that doesn't immediately mean anything. It's just a tiny puzzle piece. We also know that there was his rule-break with the edited post on day 1, but that also was a tiny issue. To add a nother small issue is the hiccup with his vote-testing (#113) to which I have to say, you could have just tested that in the Offtopic section of the forum.
Bigger accusations came from dead villagers like Meiz (#575) and I wholeheartedly have to agree, that definitely looks like a defense for Cyneheard - a by now known wolf. In addition to that he this post reads like a deliberate jab at Bob (#267) and in the end he also voted Bob on day 1, which saved Cyneheard. On day 2 he voted nauf, which was a safe null vote.
He also claimed credit for the push on Cyneheard (#432)(#489) although he never actually voted against Cyneheard (His only vote against Cyneheard was a vote that he himself called a test and definitely falls into the early joke-vote phase). He later defended that (#578) claiming that all answers lie in (#255). But I have to say that #255 post is rather weak.
Another tiny issue from night 2, he said he wanted to post something that night, but never followed through with that (#674), which is a disappointment.
Then we have the already mentioned 8 minute posts between (#716 - #718)
All in all that also doesn't look that great for GKC. I'm still very much conflicted with now 3 people being very suspicious, but I will stay on scooter, who looks the worst right now.
First of all GKC was one of the players, who was defended by a known wolf (#70) early on. I know that doesn't immediately mean anything. It's just a tiny puzzle piece. We also know that there was his rule-break with the edited post on day 1, but that also was a tiny issue. To add a nother small issue is the hiccup with his vote-testing (#113) to which I have to say, you could have just tested that in the Offtopic section of the forum.
Bigger accusations came from dead villagers like Meiz (#575) and I wholeheartedly have to agree, that definitely looks like a defense for Cyneheard - a by now known wolf. In addition to that he this post reads like a deliberate jab at Bob (#267) and in the end he also voted Bob on day 1, which saved Cyneheard. On day 2 he voted nauf, which was a safe null vote.
He also claimed credit for the push on Cyneheard (#432)(#489) although he never actually voted against Cyneheard (His only vote against Cyneheard was a vote that he himself called a test and definitely falls into the early joke-vote phase). He later defended that (#578) claiming that all answers lie in (#255). But I have to say that #255 post is rather weak.
Another tiny issue from night 2, he said he wanted to post something that night, but never followed through with that (#674), which is a disappointment.
Then we have the already mentioned 8 minute posts between (#716 - #718)
All in all that also doesn't look that great for GKC. I'm still very much conflicted with now 3 people being very suspicious, but I will stay on scooter, who looks the worst right now.
Mods: RtR CtH
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer
Buy me a coffee
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer
Buy me a coffee

![[Image: SR-creature-Werewolf_03.jpg]](https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/wolfmen/images/3/33/SR-creature-Werewolf_03.jpg)