Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis

Create an account  

 
pb62 SPOILERS- Superdeath teaches 7days to die to Jowy

Theme will be the "places of interest" in 7days to die.

https://7daystodie.fandom.com/wiki/Categ...f_interest has the vast majority/all of them i plan on using.

Looking at:

Poppin' Pills
Shotgun Messiah
Pass N' Gas
The Bear Den


Ect. Style names. The list is a bit outdated, as alot of the buildings have had names added to them.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply

Voting Ump N Lung for capital.

Any special plans going into this game?
Reply

(September 20th, 2021, 12:54)Jowy Wrote: Voting Ump N Lung for capital.

Any special plans going into this game?

Depends on where i am on the snake
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply

Dunno about nek, but start:
[Image: sSDrZ8S.jpg]
If only you and me and dead people know hex, then only deaf people know hex.

I write RPG adventures, and blog about it, check it out.
Reply

Not a super big fan of having 3 different foods techs to go for..

Small map size, im 5th in the snake.. Hmm guess "grow and tech then eat someone" probably isnt in the cards. Going to wait till i see what i have available to me when it gets to me.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply

Would it be helpful if we remove those 3 resources. neenerneener
Mods: RtR    CtH

Pitboss: PB39, PB40PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer

Buy me a coffee
Reply

Not the greatest capital. 3 food though so whip whip whip early, then workshop everything when those get good.

(September 26th, 2021, 15:18)superdeath Wrote: Not a super big fan of having 3 different foods techs to go for..

Small map size, im 5th in the snake.. Hmm guess "grow and tech then eat someone" probably isnt in the cards. Going to wait till i see what i have available to me when it gets to me.

I don't see why not.
Reply

(September 26th, 2021, 17:12)Jowy Wrote: Not the greatest capital. 3 food though so whip whip whip early, then workshop everything when those get good.

(September 26th, 2021, 15:18)superdeath Wrote: Not a super big fan of having 3 different foods techs to go for..

Small map size, im 5th in the snake.. Hmm guess "grow and tech then eat someone" probably isnt in the cards. Going to wait till i see what i have available to me when it gets to me.

I don't see why not.

Small map size. 7 people. Room for... 7-8 cities probably before borders touch and that is likely counting filler. Aggressive action, or protective-aimed civs are what im looking at.

Mali if all the good UU civs are taken.

What i wanted to try going into this PB was Hammurabi of Persia. AGG axes + fortify-able chariots (with anti-archer) seem hard to beat. ORG lets the conquest not hurt the bank too much and sets up for easier whips of courthouses.


Thoughts on that Jowy?
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply

(September 26th, 2021, 22:38)superdeath Wrote:
(September 26th, 2021, 17:12)Jowy Wrote: Not the greatest capital. 3 food though so whip whip whip early, then workshop everything when those get good.

(September 26th, 2021, 15:18)superdeath Wrote: Not a super big fan of having 3 different foods techs to go for..

Small map size, im 5th in the snake.. Hmm guess "grow and tech then eat someone" probably isnt in the cards. Going to wait till i see what i have available to me when it gets to me.

I don't see why not.

Small map size. 7 people. Room for... 7-8 cities probably before borders touch and that is likely counting filler. Aggressive action, or protective-aimed civs are what im looking at.

Mali if all the good UU civs are taken.

What i wanted to try going into this PB was Hammurabi of Persia. AGG axes + fortify-able chariots (with anti-archer) seem hard to beat. ORG lets the conquest not hurt the bank too much and sets up for easier whips of courthouses.


Thoughts on that Jowy?

Early rush usually relies on the enemy playing badly in my experience. For an aggressive strategy I'd plan around having catapults with us so we don't hit a wall. Any UU around that era could help give an edge, though they are not required. Anything that helps us get to that point faster from the start of the game would also be helpful. As far as general picks go, I was thinking charismatic might be good here. Small map, high difficulty, no early happiness resources in sight. That's all for now. I'll think about it more.
Reply

Jowy talked me out of ORG, so we have chosen Boudicca of Rome. If i start next to a weaker player, thats an easy feast. If not.. AGG/CHA Rome can expand fairly well and back up plants with threat of a nasty war me-thinks.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. [Image: noidea.gif] In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Reply



Forum Jump: