[Spoiler PB62] Vanrober in a new chapter learning from Miguelito

[vanrober]

This is the new vision, i think i would make 1E1SE next turn, what do you think?

   

[Miguelito]

How about 1E-1SW, then SE the turn after? Bit risky with animals admittedly

[vanrober]

I was thinking SW the turn after, but im fine with the other option

[Miguelito]

I think your approach off found over both forests is safer, and wee don't want to lose that scout, so it's probably better.

[vanrober]

I think the scout is important if its the only unit is goign to be around the settler before settling, that was my point

[vanrober]

This turn nothing really nice appeared.

edit: meh i forgot to take the screenshot

This is demos.

   

We need to decide in 2 turn if we make the warrior delaying the settling 1 turn or if we prefere to go risky without warrior

[Miguelito]

How far away are we from Mjmd's graphs?

[vanrober]

we have 32 EPs on him and he has 44 on us, if he moves to other people we will get it in 3 turn, otherwise it might be 4 or 5 turns

[vanrober]

Mjmd keeps trying to see us detailed, and also he keeps putting EPs on us, which doesnt seem too friendly. Also pretty unlucky There is a bear close to our Scout. No good tiles for the copper site i would say, but im not against to settle on top of it.

               

[vanrober]

I decided to go risky and taking the settler right the way without an extra warrior. In theory we could get the graphs of mjmd next turn, unless he put more EPs on us that would mean we would need one more turn.

We are choping 2 forest so in case he is comming we could just get 2 warriors in no time. But im pretty sure he isnt, according to his growth and the turns i thought it would take him to make a couple of skirmishers.

       

We are not growing our capitol for the first settler, and it might be a mistake but according to my sims the time on getting a third settler was good enough. So i think we can go like this.