November 14th, 2021, 04:58
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
Moved the stack towards mjmd, the plan is to move that stack next turn into the city spot witht he settler protected by it, Once we do so i guess peace? or should we settle for peace?
Also a bit unlucky in the south, lost the 63% odds fight. I had to whip an axe, hopefully the archer moves to the wheat instead of burning the mine.
November 14th, 2021, 09:11
(This post was last modified: November 14th, 2021, 09:11 by Miguelito.)
Posts: 4,657
Threads: 33
Joined: May 2014
The later we sign peace the better is our chance to hinder him from stealing the spot, but the higher is the chance that we don't get peace when/after we settle. 
Is there a single skirmisher on the desert hill?
If yes, we could take the hill (sacrificing an axe), move the settler to the wheat where he can't see him anymore, and offer peace, in position to plant the turn after. Mind if he has a settler there he can still steal it.
Btw, if we want better relations with Mjmd we could plant on the plains E of former Boron, where it didn't take the sheep. But I guess we are rather in a mode of not letting ourselves get pushed around?
November 14th, 2021, 09:30
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
Yeah we have already done too many things to have good relations i wont do anymore.
This senseless war will make tarkvac free win, but i dont care. They are with 8 cities already and i guess they will keep pushing hard. We wont be in possition to contest with this perpetual war.
He has just 1 skirmisher in the hill and 1 in the north of that. I already thoight into killi g that bare unit if he let us. But we will see
November 14th, 2021, 09:35
(This post was last modified: November 14th, 2021, 09:41 by Miguelito.)
Posts: 4,657
Threads: 33
Joined: May 2014
Single skirmisher on flatland could be a trap though, be careful.
November 14th, 2021, 09:38
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
(November 14th, 2021, 09:35)Miguelito Wrote: Single skirmishes on flatland could be a trap though, be careful.
The one in flatland i think will be moved into the hill when he play. In that case ill move everythign into the city tile and sue for peace.
Next turn we will have silver so the whipping anger will be less painful.
November 14th, 2021, 12:41
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
NOw SD ask us to war with civac xD this guy is crazy.
Indeed Mjmd moved the other skirmisher in the hill. So we would need to lose 2 axes for the conquest of the hill, i dont think its worth, i guess moving north and putting the settler on the spot, and not sure if asking for peace this turn or better next turn once its settled.
November 14th, 2021, 14:43
Posts: 4,657
Threads: 33
Joined: May 2014
Ah yes, if the settler moves to the plains 1N of Hydrogen we can settle next turn and he can't see him.
November 14th, 2021, 14:45
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
(November 14th, 2021, 14:43)Miguelito Wrote: Ah yes, if the settler moves to the plains 1N of Hydrogen we can settle next turn and he can't see him.
The thing is should we ask peace this turn or next one?
November 14th, 2021, 17:37
Posts: 4,657
Threads: 33
Joined: May 2014
we can't know if he has a settler around ready to plant. If he doesn't, peace is very good for us, if he does it's bad. If you don't offer peace, but next turn are greeted by a peace offer, and he has not planted (you can click on the map to check while the diplo window is open), then yes accept it imo.
November 14th, 2021, 17:52
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2020
i read it too late, already sent.
Lets see what is next turn. Idk he has no workers or units in the area so i feel he just wanted to be annoying. I hope its fine, the archer burnt the mine so we will need to work it again.
Im starting some libraries with the OF of the last axes, somehow i feel like he is taking the peace. I hope i dont regret to lose that OF into more axes.
Do you want to log in or should i end turn?
|
