(September 8th, 2025, 01:35)TheArchduke Wrote: Moscow falls next turn. Question is, do we keep it.
Can you remind me why keeping the city isn't automatically the right choice? My Civ6 mechanics are really rusty. What are the advantages and drawbacks of keeping it?
Moscow falls and is renamed bringing my culture into an acceptable range. I also establish a monument back home to push EE. I can not rely on another attack working out. I need to boom and choke Arabia at the same time.
Russia has lost 2 warriors and 1 slinger will not be able to upgrade. I hope that he keeps stumbling through his defense with archers sitting at the front. Hopefully he keeps this up, instead of establishing a fortified position.
People REALLY underestimate terrain bonuses. You can fight Elephants or Eagle Warriors with Warriors. But you gotta fortify and use the terrain to your advantage. Civilization VI offers a real wealth of possibilities for the smart defender.
Moscow was defendible. Just offer 2 avenues of attack, 2 warriors and 2 archers could easily hold it and threaten my flank. St. Petersburg is a great city with goddess of the hunt, but defend it? Very difficult. You need to cut down 2 forests north.
The last build out of St.Petersburg is another archer. No loss this turn. Although the dice prevent me from hitting his archer. The city had 1 health after 2 attacks. No matter, attack number 3 takes care of it. I bombard the archer in the east. But with the capital gone and one city left, I doubt he can offer up more resistance.
Question is what now. I need to scout with 2 eagles to get my scouting back on track. I need 2 more settlers and I need to deal with Arabia which pinkdotted me.
Lost another eagle, losses are high. Consolidate and move on to the city east.
My reinforcements arrive in time. 5 warriors and 2 archers should be able to finish off a wounded Russia. I might need a horseman for safety on that front. Maybe a worthwhile buy?