May 28th, 2018, 06:00
(This post was last modified: May 30th, 2018, 01:58 by TheArchduke.)
Posts: 4,549
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2006
So who is up for another CIV VI PBEM?
I would like to do another no civ bans game with the new expansion and the DLCs.
Basically unbalance madness, but if everyone is unbalanced, things balance out.
Anything else that should be banned?
Civ bans: Scythia, Sumeria, Mongolia
Wonder bans: VA
Map Settings:
Island plates
No huts, barbarians on
Roster:
Chevalier Mal Fet
Rowain
Emperor K
TheArchduke
Posts: 6,126
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2006
I like to watch. But not play.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Posts: 4,127
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2017
I'd like another R&F game, too, to see how the rebalance worked. I'll miss abusing Magnus to chop out 3 settlers in 5 turns from my capital, though. 
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(May 28th, 2018, 06:00)TheArchduke Wrote: So who is up for another CIV VI PBEM?
I would like to do another no civ bans game with the new expansion and the DLCs.
Basically unbalance madness, but if everyone is unbalanced, things balance out.
No Scythia, no VA. Anything else that should be banned?
Why do I smell some inconsistency here 
I'm in but if "No Scythia" then "No Mongols" too.
May 29th, 2018, 02:56
(This post was last modified: May 29th, 2018, 02:57 by TheArchduke.)
Posts: 4,549
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2006
Fine by me. Although, we should not ban all military civs, we could do an always peace game then and call it quits. 
Personally I am taking a liking to the Inland Sea map, so I would propose it again, but others may want something else.
Ancient Start, default settings, no huts, barbs on.
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(May 29th, 2018, 02:56)TheArchduke Wrote: Fine by me. Although, we should not ban all military civs, we could do an always peace game then and call it quits.
We can keep them all. I was just wondering why ban Scythia and keep the Mongols.
(May 29th, 2018, 02:56)TheArchduke Wrote: Personally I am taking a liking to the Inland Sea map, so I would propose it again, but others may want something else.
Ancient Start, default settings, no huts, barbs on.
Don't care much about the map-type. Ancient,default,no huts and Barbs on is fine by me.
Posts: 4,127
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2017
Personally, I don't care for the Inland Sea map type so much. I'd be up for something else - Pangaea or even Island Plates.
As for Civ bans, I think only Scythia - double horsemen all game long is just too great an ability, judging by how much the VA has broken games. Otherwise I like all the settings.
Posts: 4,860
Threads: 26
Joined: Sep 2006
(May 29th, 2018, 08:24)Rowain Wrote: (May 29th, 2018, 02:56)TheArchduke Wrote: Fine by me. Although, we should not ban all military civs, we could do an always peace game then and call it quits.
We can keep them all. I was just wondering why ban Scythia and keep the Mongols.
Scythia is much worse than the Mongols. The cav units are the only military units worth building and the game will end, while playing Scythia, before buildings can pay off. So Scythia effectively has a 2x production bonus which is insane.
Mongol's trading post attack is dumb but can be counted by DoWing on sight like Persia and a bunch of other civs.
May 29th, 2018, 10:40
(This post was last modified: May 29th, 2018, 10:44 by TheArchduke.)
Posts: 4,549
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2006
Island plates without VA. Scythia and Sumeria can stay in then.
I like it.
Scythia should never stay in.:D
May 29th, 2018, 23:40
(This post was last modified: May 29th, 2018, 23:42 by Emperor K.)
Posts: 986
Threads: 11
Joined: Apr 2017
I am in. I like inland sea, however we can try an islands map.
|
