Exploit isn't even arguing that he was double moved against, he's aruing that imohtep was which is just silly considering how many turns imo has missed and how little he cares. He's also said he doesn't think it was in bad faith. So no, according to what Exploit is arguing it was at all against the rules.
Now is it a double move against exploit? Not via the written rule no and it'd be pretty hard to say for sure it is against any good faith clause (which is silly as I've said before because nobody will ever really agree on these things). I'm sure exploit isn't making sure to move in order with everybody he considers enemies right now just as nobody else is. If it wanted to be played that way, considering how much everybody distrusts each other right now, you might as well enforce a turn order for everybody.
Now is it a double move against exploit? Not via the written rule no and it'd be pretty hard to say for sure it is against any good faith clause (which is silly as I've said before because nobody will ever really agree on these things). I'm sure exploit isn't making sure to move in order with everybody he considers enemies right now just as nobody else is. If it wanted to be played that way, considering how much everybody distrusts each other right now, you might as well enforce a turn order for everybody.
