Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
Niccolò Machiavelli's Thread

(October 2nd, 2013, 06:53)zakalwe Wrote: I'd say it's a good deal for us if we can tie them to a long NAP and a promise to not gift away any units in the future.

Agreed...game long NAP?

Darrell
Reply

Got this:

Quote:I'm afraid we owe quite a lot to M3 and pirates, so I can't give you
the no unit gifting guarantee. Also if we sign a NAP with you then
you'll probably just do what you did to TEAM last time (although
possibly against more competent defense now).

So for a peace deal to work for us you'd either need to offer NAPs to
other teams as well or drop the no unit gifting clause. Is that a
possibility?

we probably have weakened Gillette enough to get to space before them, if we continue this as "always peace". Not sure this game is worth playing to the end though.
Reply

Well I think it's silly that always peace and fighting 3/4 teams have become our only options. It doesn't really motivate me to play on. Maybe we should suggest calling the game as a draw or something. Unless you want to play on in always peace mode. I can certainly play a support role in that case, although I wouldn't know how to win a space race even if it were against AIs. tongue
If you know what I mean.
Reply

Zak you really nailed it. I think I'll suggest draw unless someone there would really like to see this going forward. In peace alternative I'm pretty certain we could win this via space. If we're against 3 teams, we probably lose this to Gillette, but it would be a massive grindfest that I surely wouldn't enjoy playing through.
Reply

Sent this to Gillette:

Quote:I've no will power to gather everyone behind a collective NAP. I think we could also agree to a NAP without gifting restrictions, but then we wouldn't have much intrest to give back the captured cities. I've no mandate from the team, but I suspect we could agree to pretty white peace including some kind of settling deal + NAP e.g. up to T250. If you think this could work, act fast since I'll play in ~12h.
Reply

Had a short chat with Old Harry. There isn't gonna be peace. I will turn most of our cities on building wealth and head towards Railroad+Combustion ASAP. It is pretty clear Pirates and 3M join the fight when respective NAPs end. Our chances to win are very slim unless I start a massive diplo campaign to weaken the coalition and convert TEAM ro support us, but I really won't.
Reply

Yeah I don't know what motivates people to play a team game against us for hundreds of turns.

Maybe we can have some fun with destroyers.
I have to run.
Reply

I'd say just concede and declare everyone else winners, which in our hearts is the same as declaring us the winner smile. Honestly if no one is looking forward to this let's just abort.

Darrell
Reply

Clearly at least HAK is looking forward this. I can play and probably can find some entertaining enough puzzles to make it worth my time. Not gonna give 100% for it, but enough so that we won't be easily rolled over. If others find the dogpile entertaining enough, I'm ok to keep this game running for them.
Reply

Zak - Just in case Q hasn't totally checked out from this could you ask how much gold he would be willing to give from cities? If he would promise to close borders from Pirates I would suggest him Screwdriver and Irish Coffee for 1000 g he has currently stored (could do with less in case he wants to bargain hard and depending on the price we could promise not to whip/draft them anymore).
Reply



Forum Jump: