[SIZE="3"]Turn 0 (What?! The turns don't start at turn 1 in BTS?) - 4000 BC - Part 1:[/SIZE]
So, let's start this game!
After cautiously logging in in the pitboss host (I was afraid something might blow up in another person computer due to some extra space I entered - I'm not a computer kind of guy) and even more cautiously choosing my Civ (can't miss or you are going to ruin the game!), I was greeted by this fellow:
What?! Who are you and what did you do to Auric?
Anyways, the sight of gold eased my mind of this doubts. It seems we can improve the gold from the start and we don't need 50 turns like in FfH (in quick speed, no less) - definetely a plus.
So our warrior went first:
Ivory. Not bad, but could be better. Another food resource would have been golden. Alas, that was not to be and I can't complain of a 1/3/3 tile that is one of the few early happiness resources in BTS. With charismatic + gold + ivory we are looking at a very nice advantage in happiness against the other teams. Elephants are only allowed to the Khmer, though, right?
And the the scout:
Interesting things to note:
*No food besides the corn
*Possibility of another strategic resource (might be uranian, coal or alluminiun, for example).
*Coast in the north and east. Settling 1N or 1E makes a coastal city in that direction tricky.
*Lots of plain in the west, albeit a lot of riverside tiles.
Settling possibilities: Remember, this is normal speed, so a turn moving isn't that bad
1E - gets corn, gold and a coastal tile - loses ivory and 1 of the possible strategic resources.
I'm starting to think getting the gold in the capital BFC is such an incredible advantage that we can't let it get past us. It's also one of the few tiles that we can improve from the get go here.
We could make an opening with worker first going agri -> finish worker, farm the corn (BW after agri), start another worker -> finish farm, switch worker to warrior for growth into size 2 -> when reaching size 2, work corn and gold -> chop second worker when BW is in -> finish warrior.
That would probably be a very good opening, getting a lot of commerce and 2 workers in no time. We could then chop/whip a settler or something.
This option ruins the possibility of a coastal city in the east, but leaves the possibility of a coastal city in the north.
1N - almost the same thing as 1E, but it ruins the coastal city to the north and gets both the possible strategic resources.
1W - Crazy good bureaucracy capital, with almost all the tiles being riverside. Settles on top of a probable strategic resource, which can be some sort of advantage against pillaging forces. Doesn't get the gold. We don't lose a turn moving, but we lose a turn while improving corn due to worker movement.
In place - Doesn't get the gold. Leaves possible coastal sites. Lots of riverside land. Doesn't lose turns.
There's still the possibility of a forest resource showing in one of the non-revealed tiles, like deer or a less important calendar one.
All that being said, I'm lost. Getting the gold means a significant early advantage (well, not that significant, since our city will have growth problems, so we won't be able to work the gold all the time). Our capital is going to be food poor, so we have to plan to not whip it too much, instead grow into the great happy cap it'll have and work cottages.
A capital settled in place or to the west is probably a better long term one, with more rivers and better backfill space. We can also work to have a pretty early second city up to connect the gold.
Decisions, decisions... I'm leaning towards 1E. Gold is too good to not get and will make our opening very fast. I also think a filler city to the north can have a lot of potential, helping grow cottages when needed and working the gold while the capital grows.
Looking at the map, I think whipping the capital will not be very common. We can fuel our early expansion with the crazy amount of forests near us (hint - get early mathematics fueled with gold) while grow in the cottages.
Anyway, that's my early thoughts.
By the way, the settings, if someone wants to risk doing a sandbox: