Leader Choice

[darrelljs]

.

[novice]

You suck at making polls. You need to make them public and multiple choice. There are checkboxes doing that.

[novice]

And what about Peter, Isabella, Darius, Hannibal?

[plako]

If we go for GLH, Darius could give us the little advantage needed to land it. If Mansa is available I vote for him. Otherwise I need some time to think.

[novice]

Anyway, I'm cool with Sury.

I think our plan A should be rex and cottages. Pyramids would be good if we get them, if so we just use the extra happy cap to grow onto more cottages or two scientists in each city. GLH is also a nice addon to a rexing strategy if we find a suitable place to chop it. But I don't think we should bend our game around either wonder, so we should be prepared to lose the wonders to someone more dedicated.

[darrelljs]

And what about Peter, Isabella, Darius, Hannibal?

Vote for Varn . If Varn wins, then we'll dig deeper.

Darrell

[darrelljs]

If our plan is Cottages for tech we need to take a FIN leader.

Darrell

[Ichabod]

.

OMG EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT LEADERS WHEN DARRELL MADE A POST WITHOU DARRELL ON IT.

Seriously speaking, I think we need to really discuss this. Let's not rush this decision. And Pyramids without Spiritual is not a good choice, I think. Getting stuck in Caste in a Pangae is not a good choice, I think.

[Nydaeli]

Voted Bismarck because building the Mids sounds fun. But Sury and Mansa are great too.

[novice]

If our plan is Cottages for tech we need to take a FIN leader.

Darrell

Economies

1. Espionage economy (but you're always behind)
   
2. Fin cottage economy
   
3. Non-fin cottage economy
   
4. Representation
   
5. Specialist Economy
   
6. Hammer economy
   

Discuss.

So we pick Sury and try to outtech by being larger, or we pick Fin. Sury without cottages needs both Mids and GLH to be competitive, I'd say. It would be high risk trying for that... But fun, of course.

Also... Exp is extremely quick out of the gate. Painful to make do without it.