Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis

Create an account  

 
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves

I think the best we can hope for out of CivFr is to suggest that their border with CFC might become lightly defended on the turns leading up to 175 and let their natural self-interest do some work. I doubt we'd be able to get them onboard with funding our research alongside UCiv.
Reply

(August 7th, 2013, 10:43)Speaker Wrote:
(August 7th, 2013, 08:59)scooter Wrote: There's definitely no language barrier, they just don't like doing diplo and/or don't have time for it. Their English skills are perfectly fine. That aside, I don't think we've had anyone claim to speak reasonably good French at all.
CivFR speak English. They just don't give a shit about diplo. smile

To those who aren't aware, Speaker knows quite a few of the guys on CivFr's team from Civ4 ladder play. This is why I'm resistant to the idea - it will very likely have no positive impact at all, and there's always that very slight chance it could be offensive.
Reply

Thanks for the explanation Speaker and scooter. smile
Reply

That's fine then.

@Zargon

I think we can count on them to try and win the game. Hopefully that means taking out CivPlayers when this dogpile looks like its going to fail.
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!

"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."
“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
Reply

All 3 of CivFr's neighbors will have their army in our territory. I'd be surprised if they don't attack somebody in response to that, but it's most beneficial to us if they attack CFC, and do it before we've lost more than just Starfall to them.

That said, I think CivFr's best move is to sit back and let the 3 aggressors have some leeway to increase the amount of damage they do to us, so I wouldn't be surprised if they wait a fair bit before launching said attack.
Reply

(August 7th, 2013, 10:59)scooter Wrote: To those who aren't aware, Speaker knows quite a few of the guys on CivFr's team from Civ4 ladder play. This is why I'm resistant to the idea - it will very likely have no positive impact at all, and there's always that very slight chance it could be offensive.

I hesitate to mention this, as its rude to volunteer people for jobs, but should we try and leverage that connection? If Speaker caught Moineau on chat, he could try and get an answer to the most pressing concern from scooter's missive:

Quote:We figure CFC is going to do one of two things. 1) Use the cannons on us or 2) Take advantage of our western neighbor's build-up to hit you guys with cannons when we can't keep them honest.

Darrell
Reply

(August 7th, 2013, 12:28)darrelljs Wrote:
(August 7th, 2013, 10:59)scooter Wrote: To those who aren't aware, Speaker knows quite a few of the guys on CivFr's team from Civ4 ladder play. This is why I'm resistant to the idea - it will very likely have no positive impact at all, and there's always that very slight chance it could be offensive.

I hesitate to mention this, as its rude to volunteer people for jobs, but should we try and leverage that connection? If Speaker caught Moineau on chat, he could try and get an answer to the most pressing concern from scooter's missive:

Quote:We figure CFC is going to do one of two things. 1) Use the cannons on us or 2) Take advantage of our western neighbor's build-up to hit you guys with cannons when we can't keep them honest.

Darrell

We actually did try this once, and it didn't get very far. However, if Speaker wants to try again I'd be more than okay with that.
Reply

ANY news from UCiv yet?
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!

"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."
“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
Reply

(August 8th, 2013, 12:33)antisocialmunky Wrote: ANY news gold from UCiv yet?

FTFY wink
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

I didn't completely take the gloves off, I just removed some of the padding. Chat with OT4E of CivPlayers:


Chat Wrote:scooter
that's a lot of whips :P
especially for two teams that "just want to have flexibility"
how many cities do you think you can take with an army of horse archers and knights?

OT4E
I also check civstat
you promised to attack us
we dont want to be next "inca"

scooter
we offered you a NAP several times, let's not pretend like we are the aggressors here smile
we don't want your land, and I told you that. but it seems you want ours, so I'm curious how much you are aiming to get

OT4E
Did I said something about that? This is defensive measures. We stepped on risky path, being blind and naive wont be any good for us. We see your power is growing.

scooter
Our power is growing because we have 3 neighbors who made a pact together to not extend the NAP and all of them are building up militarily
and they are all pretending like they don't plan to invade. How am I supposed to believe that though when I offer NAPs with big concessions and they reject them?
If you're serious about not wanting war, we can both end this build-up with some sort of a deal. but I don't know how to believe that when you reject all suggestions with no counter

OT4E
we planned building some military anyway. I dont say peace is impossible, may be just a bit later

scooter
so what are you seeking to gain? it's not like Apolyton's 30 drafted rifles are all for protection
I'm just trying to find a mutual solution that doesn't involve us both whipping/drafting ourselves silly while other teams race ahead

OT4E
I already mentioned that I see no problem in keeping some military. Otherwise your economic will be too strong for us. I dont want you to get it wrong or offended by this. It is just maths.

scooter
so are you telling me that you honestly have no current intentions to move military into our land aggressively on or soon after T170?
because right now our operating assumption is we have to defend against a combined civplayers/apolyton stack starting on T170
and "defend" sometimes means attack if that's the smart thing to do

OT4E
why would I tell you this?
if i promise that what will make it different from NAP?

scooter
Because I don't think you're being honest with me when you repeatedly claim you just want some defense, and I want you to have to actually commit to outright lying if you're going to attack us. wink
I do need to get going

OT4E
i will reply
sorry
have to do much home bussiness

scooter
no problem, I think I picked a bad time to chat
The gist of our feeling is this: if you guys just want war, that's totally fine. Say so, and I'll shut up and we'll settle it that way smile. But if you're actually serious about thinking war is unnecessary, say so, and we'll figure out a way to bridge the gap
We'd be wiling to pay you and Apolyton economically (maybe a great person?) for longterm peace in a way that would help you guys keep pace (because I do understand the concerns regarding giving us peace), but I feel like the efforts are futile  4:09 PM
Well I have to go, I'll talk to you later.

OT4E
ok see you later

Wish it wasn't cut short, but I really did need to go. I always underestimate how slowly he types when I go to start a chat with him.

To deal with this before the inevitable comes - yes I know this was PROBABLY a waste of time. But who cares - on the extreme slight chance something comes of it, that would be amazing.


Also - I will be gone the next 2ish days. My internet access will be pretty liimited. I'l check in if/when I can, but just know that if anything big comes in, somebody else will have to take care of it.
Reply



Forum Jump: