[Spoilers] MJW, the King of Italy BLACK BOOTS (Merovech lurks)

[Bacchus]

What orders did Rowain think you were going to give?

[MJW (ya that one)]

What orders did Rowain think you were going to give?

Are you being sarcastic? If not:

A VEN-->TRI (!!!)
F NAP -->ION
F ION-->AEG or EAS (I didn't put serious thought into which would be better so I'm spoiled by the results)
A TUN HOLDS
A SER-->BUL (Turkish army would have been destroyed)

This would have been good enough to justify not stabbing especially if I got AEG. So if Russia lied to me stabbing was a mistake.

[Bacchus]

Not at all sarcastic - just making sure that the picture reconstructed from the orders is the correct one, as I don't think you've said above what the agreement with Austria for this turn was.

[MJW (ya that one)]

Here are my orders for now... MARDOC as I'm having a little trouble sending email at this exact time.

A TRI SUPPORTS A BUD
A ALB SUPPORTS F ION TO GRE
A SER SUPPORTS F RUM TO BUL
F APU TO ION
F ION TO GRE


A little CC...

Nice stab of Austria there. Hope you can work something out with scooter with regard to dealing with TT


Interestingly, it might actually be in your interest to support Rowain back into Bud this season, even if you're taking Gre from him. If you're shaping up anti-TT, denying him the Bud build for a year (or entirely) can only help, right?

Oh that would piss off TT and cause a T+R vs me. So I have to wait to for TT to be taken out before considering that.

[NobleHelium]

You need to specify what the army that you're supporting is doing.

[MJW (ya that one)]

You need to specify what the army that you're supporting is doing.

It should hold. So it should be:


Army/Fleet (Space that the supporting unit is in) supports Army/Fleet (Space that the supported unit is in) to (destination of supported unit)
or
Army/Fleet (Space that the supporting unit is in) supports Army/Fleet (Space that the supported unit is holding)

So you don't say anything at the end and my order is correct.

[MJW (ya that one)]

In other news I have a ton of correspondence. So unless someone pipes up, by saying they like it, I'm just going to post summaries from hear on out. (Unless someone knows a method of copying e-mails from yahoo.com)

[MJW (ya that one)]

In other news I have a ton of correspondence. So unless someone pipes up, by saying they like it, I'm just going to post summaries from hear on out. (Unless someone knows a method of copying e-mails from yahoo.com)

In other news I found an article than endorses MJW meta-logic:

http://devel.diplom.org/Zine/S1998R/Dors...exity.html <--When people lie; they tend to write less crap.

[MJW (ya that one)]

http://www.diplom.org/~diparch/resources.../dozen.htm

While I think Allan Calhamer invented a great game, his ability to express himself clearly in the written word was not one of his strong points. The above article has been heavily edited in parts to make it intelligible - where is was intelligible but badly expressed, I have just left it as it was in the original.

I don't think it's logically possible to make something that's unintelligible intelligible. But I'm pretty sure that "SA" meant almost unintelligible.

I'm just going to post summaries at this point as the correspondence is just way too long. I'll just tell you that TT is starting to piss me off a bit though.

[Gustaran]

Just spamming your thread...