|
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
|
Pitboss 11 Organizing Thread
|
(May 4th, 2013, 01:12)teleh Wrote: You know I had a dastardly though that we should have a Civ settled on top of a mountain or something - a-la- that mod with the suicide samurais and the panther. Some kind of 'Not allowed to war' civ who had -some- specific function. Maybe for another game huh. Sounds like something for a different game, yes.
Seriously, we don't need a system - people won't sign up if its not appropriate.
You don't need a system for this...
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
I'll presume you mean posts Master Q.
I think if folks aren't prepared to notionally agree to update a spoiler thread in a minimum fashion, then joining a game on RB may be slightly pointless. At least it wouldn't be as enjoyable as it could be for everyone. And anyway why wouldn't you agree as a guideline to post something meaty at say turns 10, 20, 50 and then every so often after? If you couldn't be bothered then so be it. Whatevzies. No rules on updates but I think the spirit of participation says you'd want to update every now and then... why not chuck in some targets. Anyway not sure if I misunderstood. (May 4th, 2013, 02:13)teleh Wrote: I'll presume you mean posts Master Q. I believe he meant it about: "How about we assign some arbiters and tell them later? Krill, Commodore and T-hawk perhaps?" "To say whether players in a noobs game, embody the spirit of noobishness. Despite how many games they may have played. Unless it's ten. Ten is too much games." (Also, joining a game for fun but not wanting to update a spoiler thread shouldn't be too much of an issue, even if I would keep a spoiler thread. People can have fun without one!) (May 4th, 2013, 01:35)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Seriously, we don't need a system - people won't sign up if its not appropriate. Many have signed up in the past despite being asked not to sign up.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. 
OIC, then I did misunderstand.
Look the basic premise is wanting a game where most players aren't experienced*. If there are suggestions that folks may be not-so-inexperienced* as to warrant exclusion from a game with this idea, then fine. But I'm in no position to say who might or might not be eligible. We don't 'need' a 'system' and perhaps that suggestion was not great. *But* I didn't like the idea really of moving a somewhat solid imaginary line (no MP XP), to an arbitrary imaginary line (<=3 games) without some outside opinion of whether zero-xp competitors might have 'half a chance'. That's why I suggested it could be done that way. Also, we need experienced* players to be making regular and constructive contributions if the tentative game ideas are going to gel. I don't know that there's any point in getting too caught up in any one suggestion or idea, as they're all pretty subject to change if interested parties want them to. *In Multiplayer Games
May 4th, 2013, 02:32
(This post was last modified: May 4th, 2013, 02:33 by NobleHelium.)
Experience is irrelevant.* Skill is relevant.
*We are the borg. Resistance is futile.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
|
