Okay so I know I owe you guys a diplomatic overview post, so here goes some thoughts.
So I do know that Lord Parkin is winning this game currently. Maybe he's already in a "snowball" position where he threatens to be a runaway. Of course, we all thought the same thing a few turns ago about plako.
I don't know if I've mentioned this before, but we did agree to a NAP with Lord Parkin till T250. This was a turn or two before things started to get more serious in the "let's all go attack LP talks". I'm not sure if this is known in the lurker community, and/or if it's known by other players. I have been downplaying it in my conversations with others.
The deal with LP was brought on because plako went all "Cold war" on us, by bullying in negotiations, putting 30ept on us, and closing borders. So we felt like we needed to secure a deal with at least one of our big neighbors. Plako's actions were brought on because someone (I suspect LP among others) told him that I was trying to organize folks against him (plako).
So anyways, a few turns later, plako comes more contrite and wants to talk peace. I believe that somewhere in here he tried to negotiate an arrangement with LP to attack us, and LP declined (perhaps as a result of his and our deal).
So, among all this, there is tons of anti-LP talk, and talk of a coalition being formed. Now we a) can't join this coalition anyways due to past deals, and b) don't really want to because we need to use this time to grow vertically.
Now on the other hand, a long protracted war between LP and plako (and others) DOES seem like it would be in our best interests, as it would allow us some "catch-up" time. So I kind of want to encourage it.
Of course, I feel like kind of a jerk conspiring against my ally. But that's what happens when sunrise lets me do what he calls "rego diplo"
In any case, so we talked to Parkin and agreed that the timeframe for an attack on plako would be around T200. So I felt like I could "safely" sign a NAP with plako till T187 (30 turns).
If there is some sort of attack on Parkin (and who knows if there will be one or if it will be any kind of successful, I have my doubts) before then, I have some sort of deniability about getting involved (I can't due to my agreement with plako). Again, I feel somewhat conflicted and jerk-like about this. I just keep having to remind myself about the no OB for most of the game and no Christian missionaries
In the midst of all this is the Adlain talk. I don't think we can commit much to that but I want to at least have the conversations about it. Really just want a piece of that Buddhist shrine.
So that's about it. Happy everyone? Questions?
So I do know that Lord Parkin is winning this game currently. Maybe he's already in a "snowball" position where he threatens to be a runaway. Of course, we all thought the same thing a few turns ago about plako.
I don't know if I've mentioned this before, but we did agree to a NAP with Lord Parkin till T250. This was a turn or two before things started to get more serious in the "let's all go attack LP talks". I'm not sure if this is known in the lurker community, and/or if it's known by other players. I have been downplaying it in my conversations with others.
The deal with LP was brought on because plako went all "Cold war" on us, by bullying in negotiations, putting 30ept on us, and closing borders. So we felt like we needed to secure a deal with at least one of our big neighbors. Plako's actions were brought on because someone (I suspect LP among others) told him that I was trying to organize folks against him (plako).
So anyways, a few turns later, plako comes more contrite and wants to talk peace. I believe that somewhere in here he tried to negotiate an arrangement with LP to attack us, and LP declined (perhaps as a result of his and our deal).
So, among all this, there is tons of anti-LP talk, and talk of a coalition being formed. Now we a) can't join this coalition anyways due to past deals, and b) don't really want to because we need to use this time to grow vertically.
Now on the other hand, a long protracted war between LP and plako (and others) DOES seem like it would be in our best interests, as it would allow us some "catch-up" time. So I kind of want to encourage it.
Of course, I feel like kind of a jerk conspiring against my ally. But that's what happens when sunrise lets me do what he calls "rego diplo"
In any case, so we talked to Parkin and agreed that the timeframe for an attack on plako would be around T200. So I felt like I could "safely" sign a NAP with plako till T187 (30 turns).
If there is some sort of attack on Parkin (and who knows if there will be one or if it will be any kind of successful, I have my doubts) before then, I have some sort of deniability about getting involved (I can't due to my agreement with plako). Again, I feel somewhat conflicted and jerk-like about this. I just keep having to remind myself about the no OB for most of the game and no Christian missionaries

In the midst of all this is the Adlain talk. I don't think we can commit much to that but I want to at least have the conversations about it. Really just want a piece of that Buddhist shrine.
So that's about it. Happy everyone? Questions?

that would be a pretty effective way to fuel some research.
