Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore
Create an account  
Realms Beyond Forum     Gaming     Civ Game Reporting     Completed Games     Completed Civ 4 Pitboss     Pitboss 6     Team Bring It!™     Team Bring It!™ Planning Thread

 
Team Bring It!™ Planning Thread

#61
August 8th, 2011, 15:08
Twinkletoes89 Offline
The Original Nuclear Ragequitter
Posts: 4,138
Threads: 54
Joined: Dec 2009
Another thing to consider which me and pindicator have been discussing right now in the chatroom:

From looking at a huge lakes map with 4 teams of 3 and cylindrical world wrap, we are looking at an average of around 20 tiles between starting settlers of different teams.

If in worst case scenario both teams settle their second cities towards each other, that brings the distance between them (when borders pop) to around 10-12 tiles which isn't exactly massive.

We may need 2 war making civs rather than 2 econ ones as that is not a big gap and early mounted warfare is more likely.
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
Find
Reply

#62
August 8th, 2011, 22:49
Jkaen Offline
Wolfhound
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
TTs time window should be ok, can't do Wednesday night, but other than that I should be clear.
Find
Reply

#63
August 8th, 2011, 22:49
Jkaen Offline
Wolfhound
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Oh and where is this chat room you keep refering to?
Find
Reply

#64
August 8th, 2011, 22:54
Kuro Offline
Regular User
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Jkaen Wrote:Oh and where is this chat room you keep refering to?

As I mentioned in Post 8, http://tinychat.com/civstorm
Find
Reply

#65
August 9th, 2011, 00:38
Jkaen Offline
Wolfhound
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Ahh sorry missed that, thanks
Find
Reply

#66
August 9th, 2011, 03:06
Amelia Offline
Regular User
Posts: 2,257
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2010
Urgh. Count me out then. TT's time is when i'm in uni (Goddamn Asian timing). Hopefully you can find another person to replace me though.
Find
Reply

#67
August 9th, 2011, 04:15
Jkaen Offline
Wolfhound
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Ok, earlier is better for me (available from about 5PM GMT) if that helps at all and doesn't mess up the americans
Find
Reply

#68
August 10th, 2011, 00:22
Jkaen Offline
Wolfhound
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
TT and I played a couple of games yesterday with me as Ragnar of Rome, and while he was very competative, I think part of it was being able to rush which with 4 sides is of limited value, hence I still think that say landsnekt would be of more use tha pretorians
Find
Reply

#69
August 10th, 2011, 01:19
pindicator Offline
Clerics are the worst
Posts: 17,738
Threads: 82
Joined: Nov 2005
Twinkletoes and I were talking last night and it seems like the leader choices are getting down to:

Cyrus (Cha/Imp) of Mongolia
Gandhi (Spi/Phi) of France / Arabia
Pacal (Fin/Exp) of India // Ragnar (Fin/Agg) of Rome // Hammurabi (Arg/Org) of HRE

There are some parts that are still fluid. For one, we'd need to decide on France for musketeers and observatories, or Arabia for camel archers and madrassas. And also we've talked about swapping Pacal of India with Ragnar (Fin/Agg) of Rome or Hammurabi (Agg/Org) of HRE. But I also heard from oledavy that we aren't the only team looking at Pacal of India.

Are there other ideas that are still on the table? Or do we all like going in this direction?
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Find
Reply

#70
August 10th, 2011, 01:39
Kuro Offline
Regular User
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
To me, all of those seem fine. Ragnar of Rome seems fun though we lose Fast Workers.

Who do we want on each one?
Find
Reply



Forum Jump: