Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
I edited my post to include all the added trade items.
August 29th, 2019, 11:24
(This post was last modified: August 29th, 2019, 11:25 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,667
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
BAII and Dark Savant have sent me separate (but identically timed) PMs: Ancient era, Events and AI diplo on for both. First post updated.
My advice for players would be to download the mod and look at how AI diplo looks in game.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 1,027
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2009
How about demands for the enforced peace?
Whether it's a joke demand for a fish<>fish equivalent, or actual extortion to send the SoD at someone else, it's useful.
Posts: 77
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2019
Vote for ancient start and AI diplo.
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
(August 29th, 2019, 09:48)Mardoc Wrote: Also, probably worth allowing or maybe even requiring 'I have received your message which said X', if you're going to have the additional things go through the trade window.
My intentions with the True AI Diplo game option was to make it just that: a true AI diplo. Therefore I had no intention of adding additional new trade items not included in the base game. I also feel that this 'I have received your message which said X' item can still be done by echoing the same deal back. What I like about those additional trade items is that they are clear and have direct game-play consequences like declaring war.
Posts: 660
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
I agree with OH on ancient start, so no reason to go for half votes ?
Posts: 660
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
I hate typing on phone, please ignore that question mark
Posts: 12,510
Threads: 61
Joined: Oct 2010
(August 29th, 2019, 13:23)Charriu Wrote: (August 29th, 2019, 09:48)Mardoc Wrote: Also, probably worth allowing or maybe even requiring 'I have received your message which said X', if you're going to have the additional things go through the trade window.
My intentions with the True AI Diplo game option was to make it just that: a true AI diplo. Therefore I had no intention of adding additional new trade items not included in the base game. I also feel that this 'I have received your message which said X' item can still be done by echoing the same deal back. What I like about those additional trade items is that they are clear and have direct game-play consequences like declaring war.
Oh, have you modified the mod so that works? I thought this was intended to work like I've seen in the past where these were permitted typed-out in the message window or e-mailed messages and sometimes they didn't come through. Disregard all my comments if they now work like every other trade.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker
Posts: 23,667
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
(August 29th, 2019, 11:27)Elkad Wrote: How about demands for the enforced peace?
Whether it's a joke demand for a fish<>fish equivalent, or actual extortion to send the SoD at someone else, it's useful.
I do not know. Ask Charriu, but I don't think that this has changed.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 4,686
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2013
Confirming that I'll be playing. Will voice my thought on options later but mostly I am OK with whatever.
|