Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis

Create an account  

 
Anyone want to try a MP game with the craziest possible variant?

Civ V. crazyeye

I'm not kidding. I'm genuinely curious to see how it plays out against other humans. A lot has been improved about the game since release, and while it's still a pile of crap, that's mostly because of the AI being extremely abusable. (And I have to admit I don't consider Civ IV single player to be much better.) And most of the remaining badness is the retarded choice of an apple icon to represent crop yield. wink No, seriously, most of the remaining badness is that you can't effectively queue unit moves, which is not really an issue in a PBEM game.

Lots of people have written about Civ V strategy on civfanatics. Most of those writings will be completely useless in multiplayer. There's an entire game to explore, that hasn't been explored! (Even Firaxis hasn't played much MP. tongue) So, I know some of you own the game. Anyone want to give it a shot? Provide some entertainment for your fellow RBers?

Well it's now possible to play it PBEM, even though that's not an officially supported game mode. Basically Firaxis have implemented hotseat, and you can pass the hotseat save around and it's the same as PBEM. And as of very recently there's this program some people made (Windows only) that automates this somewhat so playing your turn and passing it on is hopefully not very onerous.

I think 4 or 6 players would be ideal. Also I'd advocate for an understanding that it's OK to quit and the game might very well be aborted early, because I don't think any of us would know exactly what we're getting into. (I am thinking roughly like this: if one person wants to quit we find a replacement, if more people want to quit we just call it.)

Any brave souls want to give it a go?

Signups:
1.
2.
3.
4.
(5.)
(6.)

Maybes:
SevenSpirits

(It would be smart of me not to start any more games right now, but I do want to see this happen...)

If there's not much interest now I will probably try again in a few months.

Uhh... smoke

I'd have to actually launch steam for this again, wouldn't I... yikes

Ah, what the hell, why not, I'll be as green as everyone else in this one, so why not lol

SevenSpirits Wrote:Maybes:
SevenSpirits

lol
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”

Well, when you're trying something crazy, you can count on me smile If this gets going, I'm in

Not a sign up, but I'll be very interested in reading any updates you guys write, on both the "fun" parts of the game as well as the mechanics...
Current games (All): RtR: PB83

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18

I'd be in just for the crazyness but I don't have Civ5 and refuse to pay more than $2 to play it.

Well, I can't say here's it for two, but lo and behold I just saw that it was for sale on Green Man Gaming for 7.50 today. So yeah, if anyone wants to get in on this somewhat cheap there's that.

http://www.greenmangaming.com/games/stra...ization-v/

Hell, I've been waiting for someone to suggest this since I first joined RB last June.

I'm overbooked right now, but I can't resist. Consider me in.

I wonder if the National College Beeline still works....

So with Mist, Yuri, OleDavy and me we've already reached the minimum necessary number of players. smile I'm not closing signups, but let's talk about settings.

* Do we prefer 4, 5, or 6? "Tiny" maps have 4 players by default, and "small" maps have 6. It's impossible to play Civ V multiplayer with more than the recommended number; it's gotta be either equal or less, so 5 would have to be on a small map and be less crowded. Hence my preference is 4. Lower number of players -> lower chance of it being bogged down by long turn times, and lower chance someone flakes out. 6 seems like a lot, and 5 would make for a sparser map than I think is best.

* Speed? I strongly advocate for quick.

* Map type? I don't really know the different map types well, but I'd think pangaea would be best.

* Other non-default settings? IMO none. You can turn off barbs and city states but the game was designed to have them on, and I don't want to remove them. Exploration is supposed to be very important early. One reasonable possibility is Balanced Strategic Resources. I think I prefer leaving it random.

* Civs? Well, no DLC is obvious. Question is do we want to pick them or leave it random or what? If we pick I suggest doing so in reverse turn order. (Snake pick isn't possible since there's only one thing to pick.) But I think random would be just fine.

* Diplo? I think I prefer no talking. I certainly don't want a NAPfest.

* Something I forgot? Probably.

- I would personally prefer 5-6 players.
- Speed: Quick
- Map Type: Pangaea
- No Non-Default Settings
- I would prefer picking civs. However, I would also suggest banning France. Last I checked in with CiV, France absolutely dominates the multiplayer. Additionally, if everyone has a DLC (like the free Mongolia DLC), I suggest we allow picking of that/those civ(s).
- AI Diplo, I already have enough on my plate and don't want to spend all day composing emails to sweet talk someone into an NAP.
- Anything else? Nothing comes to mind, granted it's been several months since I last touched CiV (after the July patch), so there may be something I have forgotten.



Forum Jump: