Looking for guinea pigs willing to play BUG_RtR (PB47)

[AutomatedTeller]

I like how it says "current pb -27" in your sig.

Crap.  Now I can never fix that ;

[Charriu]

Man, it's been over 2 years since I posted on realms beyond.  Charriu - are you not playing in this because you want to fix bugs and get them into the mod to be in the game?  can that be done?  switch out a version of a mod in the middle of a game?  

I think I'd like to give this a shot, sure.

No I'm not playing. Then if anybody experiences a bug I can log into that account and maybe get some more infos about that bug.

[AutomatedTeller]

0h - that makes sense

[Merovech]

Man, it's been over 2 years since I posted on realms beyond. 

Similar here - one post in 4 years before this month.  It's good to be back.  

Want a general strategy dedlurker?  Can't guarantee that I can give the time to help crunching numbers or doing micro, but I can help bounce ideas around.

[Commodore]

Need a map roller/checker?

[superdeath]

Need a map roller/checker?

I need me a partner!

[Charriu]

Need a map roller/checker?

That would certainly be helpful. I've also added all signups so far to the first post.

[AutomatedTeller]

Man, it's been over 2 years since I posted on realms beyond. 

Similar here - one post in 4 years before this month.  It's good to be back.  

Want a general strategy dedlurker?  Can't guarantee that I can give the time to help crunching numbers or doing micro, but I can help bounce ideas around.

Sure, that sounds fine.   Also, I totally hit report post instead of reply, so sorry to merovech and moderators!  There's nothing to report, other than AT has fat fingers.

[Krill]

I'm up for a teamer, 2v2v2v2, or a 3v3 or a 4v4. I'm up for a later era start if people want that. I'm not that fussed about map script, with the except of hub: I'd rather play Wheel, Ring or, at a push Inland sea. Another choice which can be fun in a teamer is a Highlands based script, but they require a lot of work to make playable. Any multiparty game could be a lot more fun if people want to actually talk in sub fora like with PB6.


I'm also fine with a standard FFA, but a 4v4 medieval game would probably be a lot quicker to run a test on.

[GeneralKilCavalry]

I'm up for a teamer, 2v2v2v2, or a 3v3 or a 4v4. I'm up for a later era start if people want that. I'm not that fussed about map script, with the except of hub: I'd rather play Wheel, Ring or, at a push Inland sea. Another choice which can be fun in a teamer is a Highlands based script, but they require a lot of work to make playable. Any multiparty game could be a lot more fun if people want to actually talk in sub fora like with PB6.


I'm also fine with a standard FFA, but a 4v4 medieval game would probably be a lot quicker to run a test on.

What’s your reasoning against hub? I’ve played a few times in ladder style games and it seemed ok - wheel doesn’t seem to be much of an improvement unless there’s something I’m missing.
I don’t think a 4v4 would be a good idea - the former two options are preferable.

Edit/Clarification:

I'm not sure how teamers here would be played. If no communication is allowed even between teammates, then there's no real downside to a 4v4. (Also, how would turn splits work then... one side is perpetually second/first? Mandate switching turn halves every so often? bleh).

If communication between teammates is allowed, a 4v4 would probably be slower than a full diplo game of the same size just due to the desire for everyone to be in agreement on research and further plans.
Then, 3v3 would be more reasonable, as would 2v2v2v2 (the latter would be nice on an inland sea map).