Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
Pitboss 6 Planning Thread

An opportunity to finally play against Speaker and Sullla ey? Well, considering it was Sullla’s website that first brought me to Realms Beyond, coupled with Pitboss 2 being my first taster of MP action; this may well be an opportunity for me to come out of BtS retirement.

However, you’ve set a very specific framework that is very tailored to your style of play. Considering that you’re looking for 24 players minimum for this (not including any potential dropouts or ded lurkers or backups etc.) and asking them to play against a very good player in his own backyard to use an Americanism. I’d bet good money that Team Spullla’s third person would be no newbie to the MP world. Now, don’t get me wrong as that’s not intended to be provocative. You’re merely stating the game type that would interest you and seeing if enough people share that interest, I understand that.

If you struggle to fill the 12 slots necessary, would you perhaps be willing to play a game with slightly less unique rules (from the perspective of this community). Always War would likely not be a problem. No diplo is definitely not my preferred style but I could deal with it I guess considering the large number of players. Medieval start though, in my opinion, is unnecessary and removes a vital part of the game (for me, the start is one of the more interesting parts to play!). I suspect that being a bit less strict on the rules would encourage more players, I could be wrong though.

As for Scooters suggestion to ‘pick team’s. I suspect that Speaker would be against this and I would echo his sentiment. This would undoubtedly produce a more fair game and much more interesting for the lurkers, however, you would have to liaise heavily between your teams and it would be good to side with people that you knew you could work with. It also could just come down to the team captain calling all the shots and controlling all 3 civs as some elaborate puppet master.
Reply

If you are going to play pitboss, this is the way to do it nod. I expect the game will start before I get back from my travels, but if someone is willing to get my civ started, I'll sign-up to take over when I get back. Or just play on a team with someone.

Darrell
Reply

I really need a break from civ, but this sounds quite a lot of fun. I'll join to "tentatively intrested" group. I wouldn't mind Medieval start, but it is highly likely Ancient one would be easier to fill up.
Reply

Did anyone notice where Speaker said it would have to be sequential turns? 12 players on sequential turns sounds like a recipe for the game to be on the slow side. (It doesn't work that the three on a team play at the same time, does it?)

This is not a signup, but I could be interested in ded-lurking with one of the teams, and in the interest of balance it could be something other than Speaker/Sullla.
Reply

I would assume teams play together on sequential turns. Otherwise how would the game even know or show the order?
Reply

Teams do not play together at the same time. Nor do they have to play one after another.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Reply

That sucks....it would be nice for teams to be simultaneous so the game is paced better.

Darrell
Reply

I am somewhat interested since the AW and seq turns gets rid of most Pb nonsense.
Completed: SG2-Wonders or Else!; SG3-Monarch Can't Hold Me; WW3-Surviving Wolf; PBEM3-Replacement for Timmy of Khmer; PBEM11-Screwed Up Huayna Capac of Zulu; PBEM19-GES, Roland & Friends (Mansa of Egypt); SG4-Immortality Scares Me
Reply

I'm interested... this sounds really fun, and PB4 just ended. But I'm worried about what T-Hawk said. 12 players on sequential turns sounds horrible. We had enough problems with just 7 players on sequential turns in pbem11.

Also, if you're doing sequential turns, what's the point of even making it pitboss? why not pbem?
Reply

Krill Wrote:Teams do not play together at the same time.

This seems like it'd make this format impossible. Perhaps 2v2v2 (with extra teammates) should be considered? 6 sequential is doable.
Reply



Forum Jump: