June 20th, 2012, 14:04
(This post was last modified: June 20th, 2012, 14:27 by Catwalk.)
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Results so far:
Diplomacy? - Full private
Always War? - No
[COLOR="Lime"] Barbarians? - split down the middle, more arguments for and against would be good
Spies? - No spies, single vote for spies minus change civics/religion
Corporations? - No, single vote in favour
Blockades? - No, single vote for modern only
War Elephants? - No, single vote for Khmer only
Tech Trading? - No, two votes for limited tech trading
[/COLOR] Nukes? - No
Map trading? - Always
Banned Wonders? Most agree with banning SoZ
More discussion on the green topics would be good. Also, we need to decide on forum access:
A) Lurkers must sign up with a team to get access, lurkers may sign up for as many teams as they like
B) Team players who are logged in do not have access to the threads of the other teams
C) All threads are open at all times
A is an attempt at encouraging lurkers to delurk. B only deals with the issue of accidentally reading threads from other player. C has everything open at all times, doubt anyone will be voting for this option.
EDIT: Adding this
SevenSpirits Wrote:I want to suggest the following for everyone to vote on, in addition to the topics Mist provided:
* See starts and settings before snake pick [Yes/No]
* Ban diplo victory [Yes/No]
* Diplo before in-game contact [Yes/No] I vote yes, yes and no.
Posts: 1,487
Threads: 14
Joined: Dec 2011
Howdy Folks 
Diplomacy-Full Private
Always War- No
Barbarians- No
Spies- No Spies
Corps- No
Blockades- No
War Elephants- Stupid Jumbo's=no
Tech Trading- No with full diplo
Nukes- No
Map Trading- Always
Banned Wonders- SoZ
Are we going to ban Apostoltic palace victory?
Posts: 23,667
Threads: 134
Joined: Jun 2009
Anyone got any thoughts on sequential v Simul turns or a double move rule?
Current games (All): RtR: PB83
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
Krill Wrote:Anyone got any thoughts on sequential v Simul turns or a double move rule?
How about simultaneous except in cases of war? Parkin is in this game and no double move rule can contain him. Isn't it possible to change between sequential and simultaneous via save or DLL hackery?
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
Diplomacy? - Full private
Always War? - No
Barbarians? - no, upsets balance
Spies? - No
Corporations? - No
Blockades? - No
War Elephants? - No
Tech Trading? - limited tech trading could be interesting
Nukes? - No
Map trading? - Always
Banned Wonders? Would leave this up to the mapmaker
See starts and settings before snake pick [Yes]
Ban diplo victory [Yes] - but allow AP to be built, so enable diplo victory condition but no one pulls a dave/pin
Diplo before in-game contact [No]
forum access:
B) Team players who are logged in do not have access to the threads of the other teams
This would mean lurkers/non-players could still read everything, right? That's what I want.
Posts: 148
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2011
Diplomacy? - Full private
Always War? - No
Barbarians? - No
Spies? - No
Corporations? - No
Blockades? - No
War Elephants? - No
Tech Trading? - No
Nukes? - No
Map trading? - Always
Banned Wonders? - Christo, SoZ, GLH if neccessary.
Posts: 2,417
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2009
Krill Wrote:Anyone got any thoughts on sequential v Simul turns or a double move rule?
Sequential may work for this game as most teams have players from around the globe who can play a turn at pretty much any time of day however, I imagine that it will become very difficult to keep even 2, let alone 3 players on a team totally clued up on what to do each turn should they be required to play it - particularly later on in the game.
That said - it completely negates the need for a double move rule - which we all know cause a lot or trouble regarless of how water-tight they seem.
Posts: 12,343
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
For Seven's questions I say.
See starts: yes
Ban diplo victory: No, But yes Ban AP victory while allowing AP to be built.
Diplo before contact: No
I also say Simul turns with double-move rule.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Seq would be too hectic IMO. Turns can definitely be played in a timely manner, but the demo aspect will suffer a lot. I'm willing to take a gamble on double move rules, this would be good chance to showcase that they work in a cooperative and competent group.
Do we want resolutions to be on? That doesn't seem to have been covered much.
Posts: 2,521
Threads: 26
Joined: Oct 2010
Sequential will not happen. Even with you guys changing vote from No Vote to Sequential, there are still three other teams that voted for Simultaneous, and this is enough to carry.
Settings as I put them up for vote are finalized, there was enough majority for all of the options.
As for a double-move rule, my suggestion is here. Feel free to pick it apart or offer something better.
|
