I've started a new thread for rules discussion here: http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3968
Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis |
Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis |
|
RBP3 IT Office - Email and technical issues
|
|
I've started a new thread for rules discussion here: http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3968
I agree the ruleset is not working, although I don't have any genius ideas to solve it (I also agree with Swiss about moving that to a different thread).
sunrise089 Wrote:My thoughts: In regards to the current dilemma, Carthage agrees with extending the turn timer if we are going the five-way split route. The reaction time sounds good (if for whatever reason we are going to miss a reaction time we feel like we will need, Carthage may decide to use one of our pauses. Hopefully that won't happen though.) In regards to 3, I don't think you guys need to be charged with a pause. Any objections to getting the order for this turn started? Finally, I think if another team dec's on one of the 5 or one of the 5 dec's on another, an attempt should be made to fit that new team into one of the existing time slots (most likely with one of their alliance members), although if for whatever reason there are issues with the sequence of unit moving we can cross that bridge when we come to it. Cyneheard Wrote:We've had to spend 3 days arguing over how to split a massive war, because India and the Ottomans chose not to preemptively declare war on all of PAT. I guess that's one way to put it .Darrell
I wouldn't blame India or Ottomans for this, just as I wouldn't accept much blame for it, nor should England. Carthage has got to be in the clear because they haven't issued a single war declaration
Playing the blame game here is just us giving in to our own pettiness instead of trying to get the game back on track.To confirm, I'm ok with the Egypt>Carthage>Ottomans>England>India turn order.
Well, as Cynehard said to avoid the possibility of what happened we'd have had to declare war on pretty much everyone in the game
. I agree there is no point in playing the blame game, but for pete's sake can we just allow double moves in the next pitboss game?Darrell
We're OK with the current turn order of Egypt -> Carthage -> Otto -> England -> India.
Shall we get this game moving again?
England's fine with that turn order.
EDIT: For the purposes of this turn (100AD), England has already moved all of its units. Reloading our moves is not necessary, and I do not believe it is in the interests of the Ottomans or India, as I mis-moved some units making them take longer to come to the front than necessary.
Ok, looks like Krill needs to play and then we will.
India, please pause it at the end of your playing for us to get a reaction time (or let it run down to say 30min if it is more than that and pause it). Thanks! Shoot the Moon Wrote:Ok, looks like Krill needs to play and then we will. Will do. Can you post here once Carthage has moved and re-paused? |