Is that character a variant? (I just love getting asked that in channel.) - Charis

Create an account  

 
[NO PLAYERS] The Kibitzer Klub: PB13 Map & Lurkers

even if fhe could keep the reach city for free, the floody/gold site is still better for growth in a snowball sense. ichabod has a commanding lead in peaceful growth in the area, he can claim anything he wants militarily later.

Then there's the metagame impact: icky is the only empire in the area not at war (if you count slowcheetah down to 2 cities because of barbs) why would he go out of his way to piss someone off?
Reply

Because it's more fun and exciting for us? Stupendous man loves the lurkers!

Played: Pitboss 18 - Kublai Khan of Germany Somalia | Pitboss 11 - De Gaulle of Byzantium | Pitboss 8 - Churchill of Portugal | PB7 - Mao of Native America | PBEM29 Greens - Mao of Babylon
Reply

Wanted to comment shortly on the plako / Dhalphir situation. Started to do it in plakos thread but it is probably best if I keep out of that one. I guess I'm responsible for the situation because I should have researched Archery right away after copper was shown in that awful location but I thought I could get Chariots in time, not believing that plako would pink-dot me like that. I still don't think that is the right move because my goal in this game if I would still be playing would be to make him lose. Also I most likely wouldn't have settled the city without roads and just 1 warrior when he is spending EP still on me and snuffs for at least 6 turns now with his scout around my borders.

Still, I definitely should have gotten Archery. I might have - but part of why I didn't want to play this game any longer was that I didn't get into it and this error is just one of many that happened because I never did focus on the game. Sorry Dhalphir for getting you I this situation.
Reply

That's a really interesting city IMO, because it provides a lot of pressure on Inca just because of the cultural control over land. I don't see why he can't get the FP/gold site later, but TBH, I actually think that area is fairly shit short term. Not enough food. Not much better later on either. I'd have done what he has chosen, just I may have executed it differently: I'd at least had a road being made to the new city.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Reply

(September 18th, 2013, 10:34)Serdoa Wrote: Wanted to comment shortly on the plako / Dhalphir situation. Started to do it in plakos thread but it is probably best if I keep out of that one. I guess I'm responsible for the situation because I should have researched Archery right away after copper was shown in that awful location but I thought I could get Chariots in time, not believing that plako would pink-dot me like that. I still don't think that is the right move because my goal in this game if I would still be playing would be to make him lose. Also I most likely wouldn't have settled the city without roads and just 1 warrior when he is spending EP still on me and snuffs for at least 6 turns now with his scout around my borders.

Still, I definitely should have gotten Archery. I might have - but part of why I didn't want to play this game any longer was that I didn't get into it and this error is just one of many that happened because I never did focus on the game. Sorry Dhalphir for getting you I this situation.

I don't think you could make him lose, not getting archery until after IW, and if you had gotten archery, I don't think he would have pink dotted you.
Current games (All): RtR: PB83

Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71 PB80. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6:  PBEM22 PBEM23Games ded lurked: PB18
Reply

Maybe. I'm not so sure. Horses are online so even without Archery there should be Chariots running around soonish. I would have not whipped that warrior Dhalphir whipped so that would be one chariot and I would have had the scouting warrior back in that 4th city so he could not take it for free as he can now. Of course he has 2 more chariots so I would most likely have lost the city regardless. But that city is worthless except as filler, what hurts is losing the settler. Anyhow, I don't think even if that city would be lost that plakos position would necessarily be that much stronger in the short term. 4 cities to 3 is not an insurmountable lead and that city also means he has no copper still.

Still, not getting Archery was obviously bad play and I'm pissed at myself that I failed there.
Reply

I really want to know what transpired between suttree and yurimack. Is anyone able to get a snippet from either one of them on google chat or something?
Fie, fie! you visionary things.
Reply

How odd is it that both Commodore and ScooPin have a worker name like "hockey player". Only temporary, but that's a strange coincidence.

So happy these two are peaceful for now. For their own sakes!
Reply

(September 23rd, 2013, 06:42)plako Wrote: Anyone else having a deja-vu feeling from PB8?

Why, yes:

(September 19th, 2013, 15:22)scooter Wrote: Oh, lovely. If I'm understanding Civstats and the forum correctly, the following sequence of events happened:

* Plako and Serdoa started next to each other. This is nice - at least someone good is there to keep Plako in check.
* Serdoa quits. Uh.
* Serdoa is replaced by unknown player, suspected green player
* Said green player starts thread in CivGeneral called "how do i mp"… That's the exact title.
* Plako logs in, razes city from said green player.
* WE REALLY ARE PLAYING PB8 AGAIN AHAH HA HA AH *dies*

Time to push for a concession? bang
Reply

The difference is that it was not the green players fault. Plako was ready to attack before Serdoa did quit. The city that got razed would have been dead anyway.
Reply



Forum Jump: