m_h and I will be teaming together
|
Realms Beyond Pitboss Planning Thread
|
|
I am playing this game alone. I would prefer a 18 hr timer (more like 24 with the slippage). Unrestricted leaders are ok if everyone selects 'random'. Barbs on, maybe even raging (the current RB pbem game could do with raging barbs - there aren't enough of them about).
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread. Ruff_Hi Wrote:IUnrestricted leaders are ok if everyone selects 'random'. If we aren't going to explicitly pick our leaders/civs, I would much rather put my faith in Sullla than in the RNG gods
dsplaisted Wrote:If we aren't going to explicitly pick our leaders/civs, I would much rather put my faith in Sullla than in the RNG godsThe random leader picker in the civ4 engine is fine - you just have to know that it picks civs and then leaders (so you get monty 3 times more often than roosevelt). With unrestricted, I would assume that every leader has an equal chance. I have an excel leader picker that gives each leader equal weight somewhere if we want to use that.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
I'd rather not go random civs tbh, at least not with the whole list. I could be persuaded to submitting a list of, say, 5 leaders and having one of those picked at random (and allow duplicates).
If others want to use random civs then I have no problem with letting sullla or the RNG pick the civ for them. regoarrarr Wrote:I guess I'm not looking for a teammate, but I wouldn't mind someone that would a) not read the other threads, b) was available to bounce ideas off, c) could occasionally play when asked to (like if I couldn't get to the save before the timer went off) That would suit me really well, playing every day is not ideal for myself. Not sure how well your ideas will bounce though, I'm a Monarch level player ![]() Alternatively I'd be happy teaming with anyone provided they do the lions share of the actual playing
"We are open to all opinions as long as they are the same as ours."
Post three updated with answers to Krill and Danski.
We just need TheArchduke to confirm his participation and dsplaisted to find a teamate. sunrise089 Wrote:Post three updated with answers to Krill and Danski. I will happily be a team mate but will have to make it a loose affiliation - got so much going on over the next few months. Like regoarrarr said: I guess I'm not looking for a teammate, but I wouldn't mind someone that would a) not read the other threads, b) was available to bounce ideas off, c) could occasionally play when asked to (like if I couldn't get to the save before the timer went off) I could commit to a and b without any trouble. |
